Low density parity check decoder

ABSTRACT

A method and system for decoding low density parity check (“LDPC”) codes. A method and system for decoding low density parity check (“LDPC”) codes. An LDPC code decoder includes decoding circuitry configured to process blocks of an LDPC matrix. The decoding circuitry includes a control unit that controls processing by the decoding circuitry. The control unit is configured to cause the decoding circuitry to process blocks of a layer of the LDPC matrix out of order.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation under 35 U.S.C. § 120 of pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/792,982 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,141,950), filed Jul. 7, 2015, titled “Low Density Parity Check Decoder,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/141,508 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,112,530), filed Dec. 27, 2013, titled “Low Density Parity Check Decoder,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/693,650 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,656,250), filed Dec. 4, 2012, titled “Low Density Parity Check Decoder for Regular LDPC Codes,” which is a continuation of Ser. No. 12/113,729 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,359,522), filed May 1, 2008, titled “Low Density Parity Check Decoder for Regular LDPC Codes,” which claims priority from U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/915,320 filed May 1, 2007 and U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/988,680 filed Nov. 16, 2007. The disclosures of said applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

BACKGROUND

Error correcting codes are used to automatically detect and correct errors in a received data signal. Generally, a data signal transmitter applies a selected encoding algorithm to a transmitted data signal. A receiver applies an appropriate decoder to determine whether the received signal was corrupted after transmission and to correct any errors detected. Low density parity check (“LDPC”) codes are one of a variety of error correcting codes.

LDPC decoders operate near the Shannon limit. When compared to the decoding of turbo codes, low density parity check decoders require simpler computational processing, and they are more suitable for parallelization and low complexity implementation. Low density parity check decoders are applicable for error correction coding in a variety of next generation communication and data storage systems.

LDPC decoders require simpler computational processing than other error coding schemes. While some parallel low density parity check decoder designs for randomly constructed low density parity check codes suffer from complex interconnect issues, various semi-parallel and parallel implementations, based on structured low density parity check codes, alleviate the interconnect complexity.

Because of their superior performance and suitability for hardware implementation, LDPC codes are considered to be a promising alternative to other coding schemes in telecommunication, magnetic storage, and other applications requiring forward error correction.

SUMMARY

A variety of novel techniques for decoding low density parity check (“LDPC”) codes are herein disclosed. The techniques disclosed present a number of advantages over known decoders, for example, embodiments allow for a reduction both in message storage memory and message routing logic. In accordance with at least some embodiments, a decoder comprises a check node unit (“CNU”). The CNU comprises a set of comparators for comparing stored minimum values to a received variable message Q. The total number of comparators in the set is less than the check node degree. A first comparator of the set determines a first minimum value, M1, by comparing a first stored minimum value, M1 _(PS), and the received variable message Q. A second comparator of the set determines a second minimum value, M₂, by comparing a second stored minimum value, M_(1PS), and the received variable message Q.

In other embodiments, a method for decoding a LDPC code comprises comparing a received variable message to a first stored minimum value to determine a new first minimum value. The received variable message is further compared to a second stored minimum value to determine new second minimum value. Indicia of the location of the new first minimum value are also determined. The new first minimum value, the new second minimum value and the indicia of the new first minimum value location are stored in a partial state storage array and provided to produce a message to a variable node.

In other embodiments, an LDPC decoder comprises a plurality of CNU arrays, each array comprising a plurality of CNUs, and each array processing a block row of an LDPC parity check matrix. The CNUs of each array are interconnected to perform a cyclic shift characteristic of the block row processed by the array.

In other embodiments, a method for decoding a LDPC code comprises applying a log-likelihood ratio (“LLR”) as an initial variable message to a check node unit (“CNU”) array. An array of CNUs processes a layer of an LDPC parity check matrix. The CNUs of the array are interconnected, without active routers, to provide incremental shifts in accordance with the number of incremental shifts characteristic of the blocks of the layer.

In other embodiments, an LDPC decoder comprises an R select unit, a Q message first-in first-out (“FIFO”) memory, and a cyclic shifter. The R select unit provides an R message by selecting from a plurality of possible R message values. The Q message memory stores a Q message until an R message is generated by a CNU, the Q message and the R message are combined to provide a P message. The cyclic shifter shifts the P message.

In other embodiments, a method for decoding a LDPC code comprises selecting an R old message from a plurality of possible R old messages based on a message index value and a sign bit. A Q message is delayed in a FIFO memory until a CNU provides an R new message. The new R message and the delayed Q message are summed to produce a P message. The P message is cyclically shifted.

In other embodiments, an LDPC decoder comprises a first R select unit, a Q message generator, and a first cyclic shifter. The first R select unit provides an R message by selecting from a plurality of possible R message values. The Q message generator combines the R message with a P message to produce a Q message. The first cyclic shifter shifts the P message.

In other embodiments, a method for decoding a LDPC code comprises selecting a first R message from a plurality of previously generated R messages based on at least a message index value and a sign bit. A Q message is generated by combining the first R message with a P message. The P message is cyclically shifted.

In other embodiments, an LDPC decoder comprises an array of CNUs that performs block parallel processing. The array processes all the block columns of M, where M≤p, rows in a layer of an LDPC parity check matrix in one clock cycle.

In other embodiments, a method for decoding a LDPC code comprises performing block parallel processing wherein all the block columns of M, where M≤p, rows in a layer of an LDPC parity check matrix are processed in one clock cycle.

NOTATION AND NOMENCLATURE

Certain terms are used throughout the following description and claims to refer to particular system components. As one skilled in the art will appreciate, entities may refer to a component by different names. This document does not intend to distinguish between components that differ in name but not function. In the following discussion and in the claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” and “e.g.” are used in an open-ended fashion, and thus should be interpreted to mean “including, but not limited to . . . ”. The term “couple” or “couples” is intended to mean either an indirect or direct connection. Thus, if a first component couples to a second component, that connection may be through a direct connection, or through an indirect connection via other components and connections. The term “system” refers to a collection of two or more hardware and/or software components, and may be used to refer to an electronic device or devices, or a sub-system thereof. Further, the term “software” includes any executable code capable of running on a processor, regardless of the media used to store the software. Thus, code stored in non-volatile memory, and sometimes referred to as “embedded firmware,” is included within the definition of software.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the following detailed description, reference will be made to the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 shows a system comprising a low density parity check (“LDPC”) decoder in accordance with various embodiments;

FIG. 2A shows a diagram of one embodiment of a check node unit (“CNU”) of the LDPC decoder in accordance with various embodiments;

FIG. 2B shows a block diagram of a check node unit in accordance with various embodiments;

FIG. 3 shows an embodiment of a check node unit of a LDPC decoder that incorporates a dynamic shift mechanism for offset min-sum (“OMS”) using the value-reuse property in accordance with various embodiments;

FIG. 4A shows a two phase message passing (“TPMP”) decoder for regular array LDPC coded messages in accordance with various embodiments;

FIGS. 4B-4D show CNU arrays of the TPMP decoder in accordance with various embodiments;

FIG. 5 shows an LDPC decoder that uses layered decoding and an offset min-sum algorithm with block serial processing in accordance with various embodiments;

FIGS. 6A and 6B show a pipeline architecture for regular coded messages in accordance with various embodiments;

FIG. 6C shows pipeline architecture for irregular coded messages in accordance with various embodiments;

FIG. 7 shows a sub-block serial LDPC decoder in accordance with various embodiments;

FIG. 8 shows an LDPC decoder including layered decoding and two cyclic shifters in accordance with various embodiments;

FIG. 9 shows another LDPC decoder including layered decoding and two cyclic shifters in accordance with various embodiments;

FIG. 10 shows an LDPC decoder that uses layered decoding and an offset min-sum algorithm with block parallel processing in accordance with various embodiments;

FIG. 11 shows a irregular block code suitable for out-of-order processing in accordance with various embodiments;

FIG. 12 shows an LDPC decoder that uses out-of-order processing for decoding irregular LDPC codes in accordance with various embodiments;

FIG. 13 shows another illustrative LDPC decoder that uses out-of-order processing for decoding irregular LDPC codes in accordance with various embodiments;

FIG. 14 shows another illustrative LDPC decoder that uses out-of-order processing for decoding irregular LDPC codes in accordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 15 shows an S matrix for an IEEE 802.16e rate 2/3 A code in accordance with various embodiments;

FIG. 16 shows an H_(b) base matrix for an IEEE 802.16e rate 2/3 A code in accordance with various embodiments;

FIGS. 17, 31, and 45 show a layer sequence for schedule 1, schedule 2, and schedule 3 processing, respectively, in accordance with various embodiments;

FIGS. 18, 32, and 46 show an S matrix in reordered form based on a selected layer sequence for schedule 1, schedule 2, and schedule 3 processing, respectively, in accordance with various embodiments;

FIGS. 19, 33, and 47 show an H_(b) base matrix for in reordered form based on a selected layer sequence for schedule 1, schedule 2, and schedule 3 processing, respectively, in accordance with various embodiments;

FIGS. 20, 34, and 48 show a check node degree vector for schedule 1, schedule 2, and schedule 3 processing, respectively, in accordance with various embodiments;

FIGS. 21, 35, and 49 show a variable node degree vector for schedule 1, schedule 2, and schedule 3 processing, respectively, in accordance with various embodiments;

FIGS. 22, 36, and 50 show a block number matrix for schedule 1, schedule 2, and schedule 3 processing, respectively, in accordance with various embodiments;

FIGS. 23, 37, and 51 show a circulant index matrix for schedule 1, schedule 2, and schedule 3 processing, respectively, in accordance with various embodiments;

FIGS. 24, 38, and 52 show a dependent circulant index matrix for schedule 1, schedule 2, and schedule 3 processing, respectively, in accordance with various embodiments;

FIGS. 25, 39, and 53 show a block column matrix for schedule 1, schedule 2, and schedule 3 processing, respectively, in accordance with various embodiments;

FIGS. 26, 40, and 54 show a dependent layer matrix for schedule 1, schedule 2, and schedule 3 processing, respectively, in accordance with various embodiments;

FIGS. 27, 41, and 55 show a dependent block matrix for schedule 1, schedule 2, and schedule 3 processing, respectively, in accordance with various embodiments;

FIGS. 28, 42, and 56 show a shift matrix for schedule 1, schedule 2, and schedule 3 processing, respectively, in accordance with various embodiments;

FIGS. 29, 43, and 57 show a delta shift matrix for schedule 1, schedule 2, and schedule 3 processing, respectively, in accordance with various embodiments;

FIGS. 30, 44, and 58 show a use channel value flag matrix for schedule 1, schedule 2, and schedule 3 processing, respectively, in accordance with various embodiments; and

FIGS. 59A-59E show a reconfigurable min1-min2 finder in accordance with various embodiments.

The drawings show illustrative embodiments that will be described in detail. However, the description and accompanying drawings are not intended to limit the claimed invention to the illustrative embodiments, but to the contrary, the intention is to disclose and protect all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 shows one embodiment of a system 100 comprising a low density parity check (“LDPC”) decoder in accordance with various embodiments. System 100 generally includes a transmitter 102, and receiver 104. The receiver 104 comprises an I/O port 106, a processor 112, a memory 114, and an LDPC decoder 110. Transmitter 102 transmits signal 116 encoded using an LDPC code to provide forward error correction. Transmitter 106 may be any of a variety of devices adapted to provide an LDPC encoded signal 116 to the receiver 104. For example, transmitter 106 may be wireless transmitter, a wire-line transmitter, an optical transmitter.

I/O port 106 is adapted to detect the signal 116 from transmitter 106 as received via the selected transmission medium. I/O port 116 may include any suitable protocol for receiving encoded signal 116 from transmitter 102. For example, I/O port 106 may incorporate an Ethernet protocol for network based communications or incorporate a wireless protocol, such as IEEE 802.11 or IEEE 802.16. The encoded signal 116 detected by the I/O port 106 is provided to the LDPC decoder 110. The LDPC decoder 110 decodes the encoded signal 116 to extract the signal encoded by the transmitter 102. The LDPC decoder 110 detects and corrects errors introduced into the signal 116 as the signal 116 traversed the channel 118. The LDPC decoder 110 preferably includes on-the-fly computation of LDPC codes as disclosed herein to optimize decoding performance, hardware resource utilization and power consumption.

Processor 112 may be any suitable computer processor for executing code stored in memory 114. Processor 16 controls operations of I/O port 12 by inputting data in the form of coded messages from remote computing system 20. Memory 14 may be any suitable type of storage for computer related data and/or programming which may be, for example, volatile memory elements, such as random access memory (RAM), dynamic random access memory (DRAM), static random access memory (SRAM), or FLASH memory.

Some embodiments of receiver 104 comprise a hardware implementation of the LDPC decoder 110. For example the LDPC decoder 110 may be implemented in an application specific integrated circuit (“ASIC”) or a field programmable gate array (“FPGA”). Some embodiments of receiver 104 may provide the LDPC decoder 110 as software programming executed by processor 112. Some embodiments of receiver 104 may implement the LDPC decoder 110 as a combination of software programming executed by processor 112 and other electronic circuits.

While elements of system 100 are described in terms of data transmission and reception, system 100 is also applicable to other systems. For example, various embodiments may be applied to data storage systems where LDPC encoded data is stored on a storage medium (e.g., a magnetic disk). Thus, in such embodiments, the storage medium is represented by channel 118. Transmitter 102 provides media write systems, and receiver 104 provides media read systems.

LDPC codes are linear block codes described by an m×n sparse parity check matrix H. LDPC codes are well represented by bipartite graphs. One set of nodes, the variable or bit nodes correspond to elements of the code word and the other set of nodes, viz. check nodes, correspond to the set of parity check constraints satisfied by the code words. Typically the edge connections are chosen at random. The error correction capability of an LDPC code is improved if cycles of short length are avoided in the graph. In an (r, c) regular code, each of the n bit nodes (b₁,b₂. . . , b_(n)) has connections to r check nodes and each of the m check nodes (c₁,c₂, . . . ,c_(m)) has connections to c bit nodes. In an irregular LDPC code, the check node degree is not uniform. Similarly the variable node degree is not uniform. The present disclosure focuses on the construction which structures the parity check matrix H into blocks of p×p matrices such that: (1) a bit in a block participates in only one check equation in the block, and (2) each check equation in the block involves only one bit from the block. These LDPC codes are termed Quasi-cyclic (“QC”) LDPC codes because a cyclic shift of a code word by p results in another code word. Here p is the size of square matrix which is either a zero matrix or a circulant matrix. This is a generalization of a cyclic code in which a cyclic shift of a code word by 1 results in another code word. The block of p×p matrix can be a zero matrix or cyclically shifted identity matrix of size p×p. The Block LDPC codes having these blocks are referred as QC-LDPC codes. The block of p×p matrix can be a random permutation as in IEEE 802.3 Reed Solomon based LDPC codes. The present disclosure gives examples for QC-LDPC codes and it is straight forward for one skilled in the art to use the same embodiments for other Block LDPC codes with appropriate modification. To enable such modification, embodiments apply a permuter rather than a cyclic shifter.

An array low density parity check parity-check matrix for a regular quasi-cyclic LDPC code is specified by three parameters: a prime number p and two integers k (check-node degree) and j (variable-node degree) such that j,k≤p. This is given by

$\begin{matrix} {{H = \begin{bmatrix} I & I & I & \ldots & I \\ I & \alpha & \alpha^{2} & \ldots & \alpha^{k - 1} \\ I & \alpha^{2} & \alpha^{4} & \ldots & \alpha^{2{({k - 1})}} \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \; & \vdots \\ I & \alpha^{j - 1} & \alpha^{{({j - 1})}2} & \ldots & \alpha^{{({j - 1})}{({k - 1})}} \end{bmatrix}},} & (1) \end{matrix}$ where I is a p×p identity matrix, and α is a p×p permutation matrix representing a single right cyclic shift (or equivalently up cyclic shift) of I. The exponent of α in H is called the shift coefficient and denotes multiple cyclic shifts, with the number of shifts given by the value of the exponent.

Rate-compatible array LDPC codes (i.e., irregular quasi-cyclic array LDPC codes) are modified versions of the above for efficient encoding and multi-rate compatibility. The H matrix of a rate-compatible array LDPC code has the following structure:

$\begin{matrix} {{H = \begin{bmatrix} I & I & I & \ldots & I & I & \ldots & I \\ O & I & \alpha & \ldots & \alpha^{j - 2} & \alpha^{j - 1} & \; & \alpha^{k - 2} \\ O & O & I & \ldots & \alpha^{2{({j - 3})}} & \alpha^{2{({j - 2})}} & \; & \alpha^{2{({k - 3})}} \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots & \vdots & \; & \vdots \\ O & O & \ldots & \ldots & I & \alpha^{({j - 1})} & \ldots & \alpha^{{({j - 1})}{({k - j})}} \end{bmatrix}},} & (2) \end{matrix}$ where O is the p×p null matrix. The LDPC codes defined by H in equation (2) have codeword length N=kp, number of parity-checks M=jp, and an information block length K=(k−j)p. A family of rate-compatible codes is obtained by successively puncturing the left most p columns, and the topmost p rows. According to this construction, a rate-compatible code within a family can be uniquely specified by a single parameter, for example, q with 0<q≤j−2. To provide a wide range of rate-compatible codes, j and p may be fixed, and different values for the parameter k selected. Since all the codes share the same base matrix size p; the same hardware decoder implementation can be used. Note that this specific form is suitable for efficient linear-time LDPC encoding. The systematic encoding procedure is carried out by associating the first N−K columns of H with parity bits, and the remaining K columns with information bits.

The block irregular LDPC codes have competitive performance and provide flexibility and low encoding/decoding complexity. The Block LDPC code is defined by a matrix H as:

$\begin{matrix} {{H = {\begin{bmatrix} P_{1,1} & P_{1,2} & \ldots & P_{1,N_{b}} \\ P_{2,1} & P_{2,2} & \ldots & P_{2,N_{b}} \\ \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots \\ P_{M_{b},1} & P_{M_{b},2} & \ldots & P_{M_{b},N_{b}} \end{bmatrix} = P^{H_{b}}}},} & (3) \end{matrix}$ where P_(i,j) is one of a set of z-by-z cyclically right shifted identity matrices or a z-by-z zero matrix. Each 1 in the base matrix H_(b) is replaced by a permuted identity matrix while each 0 in H_(b) is replaced by a negative value to denote a z-by-z zero matrix. The shift coefficient matrix S for the H matrix of a rate 2/3 irregular LDPC code adopted for the IEEE 802.16e standard is shown in FIG. 15. Here N_(b)=24 M_(b)=8, z=96. The entry −1 in the matrix S corresponds to a z-by-z zero matrix (also called null matrix) in the H matrix. The entry 0 1502 in the matrix S corresponds to a z-by-z identity matrix in the H matrix. The entry 3 1504 in the matrix S corresponds to a z-by-z identity matrix cyclically right shifted by the shift amount 3. Each row in the S matrix represents a layer in the H matrix (i.e. the 1^(st) row in the S matrix corresponds to the 1^(st) layer (also called 1^(st) block row) in the H matrix and so on). The binary base H_(b) is the same size as S. Each negative value of −1 is replaced with 0 and all other positive values (between 0 and z−1) are replaced with 1. Note that a code design usually starts with a binary base matrix H_(b) and the S matrix follows therefrom by optimizing the shift coefficient values. The base matrix H_(b) for the above LDPC code is shown in FIG. 16.

Considering now offset min-sum decoding of LDPC codes, assume binary phase shift keying (“BPSK”) modulation (a 1 is mapped to −1 and a 0 is mapped to 1) over an additive white Gaussian noise (“AWGN”) channel. The received values y_(n) are Gaussian with mean x_(n)=±1 and variance σ². The reliability messages used in a belief propagation (“BP”)-based offset min-sum (“OMS”) algorithm can be computed in two phases: (1) check-node processing and (2) variable-node processing. The two operations are repeated iteratively until the decoding criterion is satisfied. This is also referred to as standard message passing or two-phase message passing (“TPMP”). For the i^(th) iteration, Q_(nm) ^((i)) is the message from variable node n to check node m, R_(mn) ^((i)) is the message from check node m to variable node n, M(n) is the set of the neighboring check nodes for variable node n, and N(m) is the set of the neighboring variable nodes for check node m. The message passing for TPMP based on OMS is described in the following three steps to facilitate the discussion of turbo decoding message passing (“TDMP”) herein below:

Step 1. Check-node processing: for each m and n∈N(m),

$\begin{matrix} {{R_{mn}^{(i)} = {\delta_{mn}^{(i)}{\max\left( {{\kappa_{mn}^{(i)} - \beta},0} \right)}}},} & (4) \\ {{\kappa_{mn}^{(i)} = {{R_{mn}^{(i)}} = {\min\limits_{n^{\prime} \in {{N{(m)}}{\backslash n}}}{Q_{n^{\prime}\; m}^{({i - 1})}}}}},} & (5) \end{matrix}$ where β is a positive constant and depends on the code parameters. For (3, 6) rate 0.5 array LDPC code, β is computed as 0.15 using the density evolution technique. In general, for the irregular codes, embodiments apply the correction on variable node messages Q and the correction factor for each circulant is based on check node degree and variable node degree. In these embodiments, the Q message can be performed either by scaling down the messages with a scaling factor (Q=Q·α) or by applying an offset to the magnitude of Q message, (Q=sgn(Q)max(|Q|−β,0) The sign of check-node message R_(mn) ^((i)) is defined as:

$\begin{matrix} {{\delta_{mn}^{(i)}\left( {\prod\limits_{n^{\prime} \in {{N{(m)}}{\backslash n}}}^{\;}\;{{sgn}\left( Q_{n^{\prime}\; m}^{({i - 1})} \right)}} \right)}.} & (6) \end{matrix}$ Step 2. Variable-node processing: for each n and m∈M(n):

$\begin{matrix} {{Q_{n\; m}^{(i)} = {L_{n}^{(0)} + {\sum\limits_{m^{\prime} \in {{M{(n)}}\backslash m}}R_{m^{\prime}n}^{(i)}}}},} & (7) \end{matrix}$ where the log-likelihood ratio of bit n is L_(n) ⁽⁰⁾=y_(n). Step 3. Decision: for final decoding

$\begin{matrix} {P_{n} = {L_{n}^{(0)} + {\sum\limits_{m \in {M{(n)}}}{R_{mn}^{(i)}.}}}} & (8) \end{matrix}$ A hard decision is taken by setting {circumflex over (x)}_(n)=0if P_(n)(x_(n))≥0, and {circumflex over (x)}_(n)=1if P_(n)(x_(n))<0. If {circumflex over (x)}H^(T)=0, the decoding process is finished with {circumflex over (x)}_(n) as the decoder output; otherwise, repeat steps 1-3. If the decoding process doesn't end within predefined maximum number of iterations, it_(max), stop and output an error message flag and proceed to the decoding of the next data frame.

In TDMP, an array LDPC with j block rows can be viewed as a concatenation of j layers or constituent sub-codes. After the check-node processing is finished for one block row, the messages are immediately used to update the variable nodes (in step 2, above), whose results are then provided for processing the next block row of check nodes (in step 1, above). The vector equations for TDMP for array LDPC codes assuming that the H matrix has the structure in equation (1) are illustrated first. These equations are directly applicable to all other regular QC-LDPC codes (such as cyclotomic coset based LDPC). For rate compatible array LDPC codes and Block LDPC codes, minor modifications in the vector equations are necessary. {right arrow over (R)}_(l,n) ⁽⁰⁾=0, {right arrow over (P)}_(n)={right arrow over (L)}_(n) ⁽⁰⁾ [Initialization for each new received data frame],  (9) ∀i=1, 2, . . . , it_(max) [Iteration loop], ∀l=1,2, . . . , j [Sub-iteration loop], ∀n=1,2, . . . , k [Block column loop], [{right arrow over (Q)} _(l,n) ^((i))]^(S(l,n))=[{right arrow over (P)} _(n)]^(S(ln,)) −{right arrow over (R)} _(l,n) ^((i−1)),  (10) {right arrow over (R)} _(l,n) ^((i))=f([{right arrow over (Q)} _(l,n′) ^((i))]^(S(l,n′)) , ∀n′=1,2, . . . , k),  (11) [{right arrow over (P)} _(n)]^(S(l,n))=[{right arrow over (Q)} _(l,n) ^((i))]^(S(l,n)) +{right arrow over (R)} _(l,n) ^((i)),  (12) where the vectors {right arrow over (R)}_(l,n) ^((i)) and {right arrow over (Q)}_(l,n) ^((i)) represent all the R and Q messages in each p×p block of the H matrix, and _(s(l,n)) denotes the shift coefficient for the block in l^(th)block row and n^(th) block column of the H matrix. [{right arrow over (Q)}_(l,n) ^((i))]^(S(l,n)) denotes that the vector {right arrow over (Q)}_(l,n) ^((i)) is cyclically shifted up by the amount s(l,n) and k is the check-node degree of the block row. A negative sign on s(l,n) indicates that it is a cyclic down shift (equivalent cyclic left shift). f(⋅) denotes the check-node processing, which embodiments implement using, for example, a Bahl-Cocke-Jelinek-Raviv algorithm (“BCJR”) or sum-of-products (“SP”) or OMS. Some embodiments use OMS as defined in equations (4)-(6). In an embodiment that processes a block row in serial fashion using _(p) check-node units, as in equation (11), the output of the CNU will also be in serial form. As soon as the output vector {right arrow over (R)}_(l,n) ^((i)) corresponding to each block column n in H matrix for a block row l is available, the output vector can be used to produce updated sum [{right arrow over (P)}_(n)]^(S(l,n)) (equation (12)). The updated sum can be immediately used in equation (10) to process block row l+1 except that the shift s(l,n) imposed on {right arrow over (P)}_(n) has to be undone and a new shift s(l+1,n) has to be imposed. This re-shifting can be simply done by imposing a shift corresponding to the difference of s(l+1,n) and s(l,n).

Note that due to the slight irregularity in the array LDPC matrix defined in equation (2), each block row l has a node degree j−l +1. The variable-nodes in each block column n have a node degree equal to min(n,j). One way to simplify implementation is to assume that all the block rows have equal check-node degree and to set the check-node messages corresponding to null blocks in the H matrix to zero in order not to affect the variable-node processing. Similarly, the variable-node messages belonging to the null blocks are always set to positive infinity in order not to affect the check-node processing. For check-node update based on SP or OMS, the message with maximum reliability won't affect the CNU output. In the specific case of OMS, this is easily seen as the CNU magnitude is dependent on the two least minimum.

There are several null blocks in the Block LDPC codes defined by equation (3). So the above method for dealing with irregularity introduces significant idle clock cycles. Some embodiments deal with this check-node irregularity by setting the check-node degrees in a CNU processor unit based on the block row that is being processed. In addition, out-of-order processing is enforced in the generation of R messages as explained below.

The micro-architecture of an embodiment of a serial CNU for OMS is now considered. For each check node m, |R_(mn) ^((i))|∀n∈N(m) takes only two values, which are the two minimum of input magnitude values. Since ∀n∈N(m), δ_(mn) ^((i)) takes a value of either +1 or −1 and |R_(mn) ^((i))|takes only 2 values, equation (4) gives rise to only three possible values for the whole set, R_(mn) ^((i)) ∀n∈N(m). In a very-large-scale integration (“VLSI”) implementation, this property significantly simplifies the logic and reduces the memory.

FIG. 2A shows an embodiment of a Check-Node Unit (“CNU”) micro-architecture 200 for OMS that applies the value re-use property. FIG. 2B shows the block diagram of the same. The exemplary micro-architecture is considered as applied to a (5, 25) code. In the first 25 clock cycles of the check-node processing, incoming variable messages (Q 204) are compared with the two up-to-date least minimum numbers (partial state, PS) 206, 208 to generate the new partial state, M1 206 which is the first minimum value, M2 208 which is the second minimum value, and the index of M1 224. The final state (FS) is then computed by offsetting the partial state. It should be noted that the final state includes only M1, −M1, +/−M2 with offset correction applied to each. M1_M2 finder 202 computes the two least numbers, according to the incoming data 204 and the current minimum numbers 206, 208 stored in partial state. The offset module 210 applies the offset correction, and stores the results in the Final State module 212. R selector 216 then assigns one out of these 3 values, based on the index of M1 218 and the sign of R message generated by sign exclusive “or” (“XOR”) logic, equation (6), to the output R messages. While the final state has dependency on offset correction, the offset is dependent on the completion of partial state 214. In operation, the final state 212 and partial state 214 will operate on different check-nodes. The serial CNU 200 finds the least two minimum numbers 206, 208 with 2 comparators 200, 222 in a serial fashion and reduces the number of offset-correction computations from k to 2. Normally, CNU processing is done using signed magnitude arithmetic for equations (4)-(6). Variable-node unit (“VNU”) processing of equation (7) is done in 2's complement arithmetic. Such processing requires 2's complement to signed magnitude conversion at the inputs of CNU and signed magnitude to 2's complement conversion at the output of CNU. In various embodiments, however, 2's complement is applied to only 2 values instead of k values at the output of CNU. The value re-use property also reduces the memory requirement significantly. Conventionally, the number of messages each CNU stores is equal to the number of edges it has, that is k. In some embodiments, only four units of information are needed: the three values that R_(mn) ^((i)) may take (M1, −M1, +/−M2 all with offset correction) and the location of M1 _(m) ^((i)) (index of M1). A check-node message to the VNU is then readily chosen by multiplexing. Some embodiments to store only M1, M2, and the index of M1 to effectuate further savings in the memory required to store the Final State (FS).

FIG. 4A shows a low density parity check decoder 400 for TPMP and OMS for regular array LDPC codes in accordance with various embodiments. Specifically, in this example, a decoder for an array LDPC code of length 1830 with the circulant matrix size of 61 is shown. The check node processing unit array is composed of 3 sub-arrays 402, 406, 408. Each sub-array (as shown in FIG. 4B) contains 61 serial CNUs (e.g., FIG. 2 200) which compute the partial state for each block row to produce the check-node messages for each block column of H. CNU array block row 1 402 is an array of 61 simple CNUs 200.

Cyclic shifters, generally, consume approximately 10%-20% of chip area based on the decoder's parallelization and constitute the critical path of the decoder. If all the block rows are assigned to different computational unit arrays of CNUs and serial CNU processing across block rows is employed, then embodiments use constant wiring to achieve any cyclic shift as each subsequent shift can be realized using the feedback of a previous shifted value. Embodiments thus eliminate both the forward router between CNU and VNU and the reverse router between VNU and CNU. This is possible because block-serial processing is employed and array codes have a constant incremental shift in each block row. For the first block row, the shift and incremental shift is 0. For the second block row, the shifts are [0,1,2, . . . ] and the incremental shift is 1. For the third block row, the shifts are [0, 2, . . . ] and the incremental shift is 2. In this TPMP architecture embodiment, the check node messages in the H matrix are produced block column wise so that all the variable messages in each block column can be produced on the fly. These variable-node messages can be immediately consumed by the partial state computation sub-units in the CNUs. Such scheduling results in savings in message passing memory that is needed to store intermediate messages. The savings in message passing memory due to scheduling are 80%, in some cases, as embodiments need to store only the sign bits of variable node messages. Forward and reverse routers are eliminated, reducing the number of multiplexers required.

CNU array block rows 2 and 3 (406, 408) are composed of dynamic CNUs 300. The variable node processing array 404 is composed of 61 parallel VNU units which can process 3×61 messages at each clock cycle. The sign bits will be stored in a first-in-first-out memory (“FIFO”) (implemented as RAM), however, there is no need to subject these values to shifts as these values are not modified in check node processing partial state processing. In the array 402 of simple serial CNU 200 that is designed to do check node processing for first block row in H matrix, the check node processing for each row in H matrix is done such that all the comparisons are performed locally within one CNU to update the partial state each clock cycle and transfer the partial state to final state once every cycle.

As shown in FIG. 3, in the dynamic CNU 300, the M1_M2 finder 302 and offset block 306 receive partial state input from another CNU rather than partial state block 304. The final state block 310 receives input from both the offset block 306 and another CNU 300. Accordingly, the partial state block 304 and final state block 310 provide output to other CNUs 300. In CNU array 406 (shown in FIG. 4C), designed for the second block row in an H matrix, CNU122 gets its partial state from CNU121, CNU121 gets its partial state from CNU120 and so on. The array of dynamic CNU 408 (shown in FIG. 4D) is designed for the third block row in an H matrix such that the connection between partial state registers among various units achieve cyclic shifts of [0,2, . . . ,58], thus CNU125 gets its partial state from CNU 123. A similar principle is applied when making connections for the final state in the CNU array to achieve reverse routing (i.e., CNU123 gets its partial state from CNU183 and CNU 182).

Initially the variable messages are available in row wise as they are set to soft log-likelihood information (“LLR”) of the bits coming from the channel. Q Init 410 is a RAM of size 2N and holds the channel LLR values of two different frames. Q Init 410 can supply _(p) intrinsic values to the VNUs each clock cycle. The data path of the embodiment is set to 5 bits to provide the same bit error rate (“BER”) performance as that of a floating point sum of products algorithm with 0.1-0.2 dB SNR loss. Each iteration takes d_(c)+3 clock cycles. For (3, 30) code this results in 6×33 clock cycles to process each frame when a maximum number of iterations set to 6. For (3, 6) code this results in 20×9 clock cycles to process each frame when the number of iterations is set to 20.

FIG. 5 shows a turbo decoding message passing decoder 500 in accordance with various embodiments. As a matter of simplification, the present disclosure illustrates the architecture for a specific structured code: a regular array code of length 1525 described by equation (1), j=5, k=25 and _(p=)61,. One skilled in that art will understand that the example can be easily generalized to any other structured code. The functionality of each block in the architecture is explained below. In discussing the present and subsequent embodiments, a distinction is made regarding the various R messages presented. Assume, for example, that layer I and iteration i are presently being processed. The next layer to be processed in the present iteration i has R messages that were computed in the previous iteration. These messages are termed “R old” messages. The layer presently being processed in the present iteration has R messages that were computed in the previous iteration. These messages are termed “R prev” messages. The R messages that are being computed for the present layer in the present iteration are termed “R new” messages.

The CNU array 502 is composed of p computation units (CNU 200 described supra) that compute the partial state for each block row to produce the R messages 526 in block serial fashion. The final state of previous block rows, in which the compact information for CNU messages is stored, is needed for TDMP. The final state information is stored in register banks 504. Here is one register bank 504 of depth j−1, which is 4 in this example, connected with each CNU 200. Each final state register bank 504 is the same as the final state register bank 226 in the CNU 200. In addition to the shifted Q messages 506, the CNU array 502 takes as input the sign information 508 from previously computed Q messages in order to perform an R selection operation. The R sign bits are stored in sign FIFO 510. The total length of sign FIFO 510 is k and each block row has p one bit sign FIFOs. Embodiments employ j−1 of such FIFO banks 510 in total.

Quantity p R select units 512 are used for generation of R old 516. An R select unit 512 generates the R messages for 25(=k) edges of a check-node from three possible values stored in a final state register associated with that particular check-node in a serial fashion. Its functionality and structure is the same as the block denoted as R select 216 in CNU 200. The R select unit 512 can be treated as a de-compressor of the check node edge information which is stored in compact form in FS registers 504. The generation of R messages 516 for all the layers in this way amounts to substantial memory savings.

The shifter 514 is constructed as cyclic up logarithmic shifter to achieve the cyclic shifts specified by the binary encoded value of the shift. The logarithmic shifter 514 is composed of log 2(p) stages of p switches. Since cyclic down shift is also needed in the operation of the decoder, cyclic down shift by u can be simply achieved by doing cyclic up shift with p−u on the vector of size p.

The decoding operation proceeds as per the vector equations (9)-(12). In the beginning of the decoding process, P vector 520 is set to receive channel values in the first k clock cycles (i.e. the first sub-iteration) as the channel values arrive in chunks of p, while the output vector 516 of R select unit 512 is set to a zero vector. In some embodiments, the multiplexer array 518 at the input of cyclic shifter 514 is used for this initialization. In other embodiments, a multiplexer at the input of Q message FIFO 524 selects channel values for FIFO storage during initialization.

The CNU array 502 takes the output of the cyclic shifter 514 serially, and the partial state stage 214 operates on these values. After k clock cycles, partial state processing will be complete and the final state stage 212 in CNU array 502 will produce the final state for each check-node in 2 clock cycles. Subsequently, R select unit 216 within each CNU unit 200 starts generating k values of check-node messages in serial fashion. The CNU array 502 thus produces the check-node messages in a block serial fashion as there are p CNUs 200 operating in parallel. The P vector 520 is computed by adding the delayed version of the Q vector (which is stored into a FIFO SRAM 524 until the serial CNU produces the output) to the output vector R 526 of the CNU 502. Note that the P vector 520 that is generated can be used immediately to generate the Q vector as the input to the CNU array 502 as CNU array 502 is ready to process the next block row. This is possible because CNU processing is split into three stages as shown in the pipeline diagrams 6A-6B and partial state stage 214 and final state stage 212 can operate simultaneously on two different block rows. The P message vector 520 will undergo a cyclic shift by the amount of difference of the shifts of the block row that is being processed, and the block row that was last processed. This shift value can be either positive or negative indicating respectively that the cyclic shifter needs to perform an up shift or down shift. The R message 516 is subtracted from the shifted P sum message to produce the shifted version of the Q message 506.

The snapshot of the pipeline of the decoder 500 is shown in FIGS. 6A and 6B. FIG. 6A is detailed diagram and FIG. 6B is a simple diagram. In this illustration, the partial state stage 214 in CNU 200 is operating on the 2^(nd) block row from clock cycles labeled as 0 to 24 (note that these numbers will not denote the actual clock numbers as the snapshot is shown in the middle of the processing). Final state stage 212 in CNU 200 can not start until the end of PS processing, that is clock cycle 25. As soon as the FS is done in clock cycle 26, R select 216 is able to select the output R messages, and P and Q message processing starts. With the first block of Q message ready, partial state for next block row can be started immediately. Note that all the logic blocks (other than the storage elements) are active over 90% of the time. The only exception is the offset module 226, which is composed of two 5-bit adders, in each CNU 200. The overall proportion of all the CNU FS logic 212 in the overall decoder 500 is less than 4%. The control unit 528 contains the information of array code parameters such as j,k,q—these parameters can be changed to support multi-rate decoding.

A family of rate-compatible codes is obtained by successively puncturing the left most p·columns and the topmost p rows in the H matrix defined in equation (2) q times. Changing q from 0 to 3(=j−2) gives the code rates of 0.8 to 0.909. Changing k values from 15 to 61 while fixing j=5 results in code rates from 0.666 to 0.91. The Q FIFO needs to be of maximum depth _(p) as the k can take a maximum value equal to _(p). Note that for Block LDPC codes, the Q FIFO may be replaced with a random access memory of the same size, as shown in FIG. 12. In addition out-of-order processing is employed on R selection for R new to account for the irregularity of Block LDPC codes

Note that the throughput of the architecture is increased by increasing p of the code, and scaling the hardware accordingly. While the complexity of computational units scales linearly with p, the complexity of the cyclic shifter increases with the factor (p/2) log₂ p. So, it is necessary to change the architecture for large values of p. Alternatively it may be desirable to have low parallelization in low throughput applications. To suit this requirement, minor changes in the proposed architecture are necessary. Assume that the desired parallelization is M<p. For ease of implementation, choose M close to a power of 2. The cyclic shifter needed is M×M. Since a p×p cyclic shift is to be achieved with consecutive shifts of M×M, it is necessary for the complete vector of size p to be available in M banks with the depth s=(ceil(p/M)) and shifting is achieved in part by the cyclic shifter, and in part by address generation. In such embodiments, all the CNU and variable node processing is done in a time division multiplexed fashion for each sub-vector of length M, so as to process the vector of size p to mimic the pipeline in FIG. 6A, 6B. Such processing is referred to as sub-block serial processing.

FIG. 7 shows a sub-block serial LDPC decoder in accordance with various embodiments. The final state array 504, R select unit 512, and sign bit array 510 are as described above in relation to decoder 500. The CNU array 702 includes M CNUs 200, where M<p, resulting in a reduction of CNU array logic as described above. Because CNU array 702 processes sub-blocks rather than blocks, the results of sub-block processing, i.e., intermediate block processing partial state data, is stored in memory 730. These intermediate results are read into the CNU array as block processing progresses.

An M×M permuter (i.e., cyclic shifter) 714 is used as described above. As explained, shifting of the vector P is accomplished by a combination of permuter 714 shifts and addressing of P buffer 718.

FIG. 8 shows an LDPC decoder 800 including layered decoding and two cyclic shifters in accordance with various embodiments. The vector equations applicable to this embodiment comprise the following: {right arrow over (R)}_(l,n) ⁽⁰⁾=0, {right arrow over (P)}_(n)={right arrow over (L)}_(n) ⁽⁰⁾[Initilization for each new received data frame],  (13) ∀i=1,2, . . . , it_(max) [Iteration loop], ∀l=1,2, . . . , k [Sub-iteration loop], ∀n=1,2, . . . , k [Block column loop], [{right arrow over (Q)} _(l,n) ^((i))]^(S(l,n))=[{right arrow over (P)} _(n)]^(S(l,n′)) −{right arrow over (R)} _(l,n) ^((i−1)),  (14) {right arrow over (R)} _(l,n) ^((i))=f([{right arrow over (Q)} _(l,n′) ^((i))]^(S(l,n′)) , ∀n′=1,2, . . . , K),  (15) {right arrow over (P)} _(n) ={right arrow over (P)} _(n)+[{right arrow over (R)} _(l,n) ^((i)) −{right arrow over (R)} _(l,n) ^((i−1))]^(−S(l,n′)),  (16) where the various terms are as defined in regard to equations (9)-(12) above. The decoder 800 is illustrated as configured for the same code used to illustrate decoder 500, a regular array code of length 1525 described by equation (1), j=5, k=25 and _(p =)61.

Decoder 800 includes a CNU array 502 and a sign FIFO array 510 as described above in regard to decoder 500. The final state array 804 is similar to array 504, but includes five rather than 4 register banks. Two R select units 812, 813 are included as are a cyclic down shifter 814 and a cyclic up shifter 815. The R select units 812, 813 are functionally equivalent to R selector 512 described above. Sign FIFO 824 delays application of sign bits to R select unit 813. In accordance with equation (14), shifted Q message 806, input to CNU array 502, is produced by subtracting the R old message 816 provided by the R selector unit 812 from the P message 820 shifted by the cyclic up shifter 815. The P message 820 is constructed by adding the difference of the R new message 826 from the CNU array 502 and the R prev message 832 provided by R selector unit 813 shifted by cyclic down shifter 814 to the P message 828 provided by P memory 830.

At the beginning of the decoding process, multiplexer 518, coupled to the input of the P memory 830, is set to provide channel values to P memory 830. The channel values serve as initial P messages to initialize the decoder 800.

FIG. 9 shows another LDPC decoder 900 including layered decoding and two cyclic shifters in accordance with various embodiments. The vector equations applicable to this embodiment comprise the following: {right arrow over (R)}_(l,n) ⁽⁰⁾=0,{right arrow over (P)}_(n)={right arrow over (L)}_(n) ⁽⁰⁾ [Initialization for each new received data frame],  (17) ∀i=1,2, . . . , it_(max) [Iteration loop], ∀l=1,2, . . . , j [Sub-iteration loop], [{right arrow over (Q)} _(l,n) ^((i))]^(S(l,n))=[{right arrow over (P)} _(n)]^(S(l,n)) −{right arrow over (R)} _(l,n) ^((i−1)),  (18) {right arrow over (R)} _(l,n) ^((i))=f([{right arrow over (Q)} _(l,n′) ^((i))]^(S(l,n′)) ,∀n′=1,2, . . . , k),  (19) [{right arrow over (P)} _(n)]^(S(l,n))=[{right arrow over (P)} _(n)]^(S(l,n)) +{right arrow over (R)} _(l,n) ^((i)) −{right arrow over (R)} _(l,n) ^((i−1))  (20) where the various terms are as defined in regard to equations (9)-(12) above. The decoder 900 is illustrated as configured for the same code used to illustrate decoders 500 and 800, a regular array code of length 1525 described by equation (1), j=5, k=25 and p=61.

Decoder 900 includes a CNU array 502 and a sign FIFO array 510 as described above in regard to decoder 500. The final state array 804, R select units 812, 813, cyclic shifters 814, 815, and sign FIFO 824 are as described above in regard to decoder 800. In accordance with equation (18), shifted Q message 906, input to CNU array 502, is produced by subtracting an R old message 932 provided by the R selector unit 812 from the shifted P message 920. The P message 920 is constructed (equation (20)) by adding the difference of the R new message 926 from the CNU array 502 and the R prev message 916 provided by R selector unit 813 to the P message provided by P memory 830 shifted by cyclic up shifter 900. The decoder 900 is initialized by selecting channel values for storage in P memory 830 using multiplexer 518 as described above in regard to decoder 800.

FIG. 10 shows an LDPC decoder 1000 that uses layered decoding and an offset min-sum algorithm with block parallel processing in accordance with various embodiments. As does decoder 500, embodiments of decoder 1000 apply vector equations (9)-(12). The difference between the two decoders, 500 and 1000, being that decoder 1000 processes all the block columns of M (where, M≤p) rows in a layer in one clock cycle. In decoder 500, which employs block serial processing, one block column is processed for p rows. In decoder 700, which employs sub-block serial processing, one block column is processed for M rows, where M≤p. Thus, embodiments of decoder 1000 use a check node unit array 1002 that can find M1 and M2 in one or two clock cycles when all the inputs to CNU are present at the same time.

For the irregular block LDPC codes, the TDMP algorithm can be described with equations (21)-(24): {right arrow over (R)}_(l,n) ⁽⁰⁾=0,{right arrow over (P)}_(n)={right arrow over (L)}_(n) ⁽⁰⁾ [Initialization for each new received data frame],  (21) ∀i=1, 2, . . . , it_(max) [Iteration loop], ∀l =1,2, . . . , j [Sub-iteration loop], ∀n=1,2, . . . , k [Block column loop], [{right arrow over (Q)} _(l,n) ^((i))]^(S(l,n))=[{right arrow over (P)} _(n)]^(S(l,n)) −{right arrow over (R)} _(l,n) ^((i−1)),  (22) {right arrow over (R)} _(l,n) ^((i))=f([{right arrow over (Q)}_(l,n′) ^((i))]^(S(l,n′)) , ∀n′=1,2, . . . , k),  (23) [{right arrow over (P)} _(n)]^(S(l,n))=[{right arrow over (Q)} _(l,n) ^((i))]^(S(l,n)) +{right arrow over (R)} _(l,n) ^((i)),  (24) where the vectors {right arrow over (R)}_(l,n) ^((i)) and {right arrow over (Q)}_(l,n) ^((i)) represent all the R and Q messages in each non-zero block of the H matrix, s(l,n) denotes the shift coefficient for the l^(th) block row and n^(th) non-zero block of the H matrix (note that null blocks in the H matrix need not be processed); [{right arrow over (R)}_(l,n) ^(i−1)]^(S(l,n)) denotes that the vector {right arrow over (R)}_(l,n) ^(i−1) is cyclically shifted up by the amount s(l,n), and k is the check-node degree of the block row or the layer. A negative sign on s(l,n) indicates that it is cyclic down shift (equivalent cyclic left shift). f(⋅) denotes the check-node processing, which can be performed using BCJR, SP or MS.

To accommodate the irregularity in block LDPC codes, the R selection unit for selecting R old ({right arrow over (R)}_(l,n) ^((i−1)) in equation (22)) and partial state processing are executed in linear order for the current layer (i.e. first non-zero block, second non-zero block, etc. in a layer). The order of R generation for R new processing ({right arrow over (R)}_(l,n) ^((i)) in equation (23)), however, is determined by the non-zero blocks of the next layer to be processed because {right arrow over (Q)}_(l,n) ^((i)) in equation (22) of the next layer is dependent on [{right arrow over (P)}_(n)] in equation (24) of the last layer that is updated (this is not necessarily the previous layer in the H matrix because of the irregularity of the H matrix) which in turn depends on {right arrow over (R)}_(l,n) ^((i)) in equation (23) of the previous layer. Furthermore, since the check node degree of each layer in Irregular Block codes may vary widely, it is not efficient to process each layer for a number of clock cycles equal to the maximum check-node degree. Additionally, data dependencies may necessitate that the processing of the next layer be stalled. To address these inefficiencies, embodiments apply out-of-order processing on R new generation. The R select unit for R new may operate on any of the previous layers. R generation is independent of PS or FS processing, so, out-of-order R message generation imposes no any additional restriction on the architecture.

Based on the desired hardware implementation objectives, for example, the number of pipeline stages required in a hardware implementation without stall cycles and/or reducing the number of memory accesses, embodiments optimize the processing order of the layers in the H matrix. Such processing is referred to as reordering of layers. In an H matrix having 8 layers, there are factorial of 8 combinations to choose for the processing order. Embodiments generate a permutation such that two adjacent layers have many independent circulants and then generate the decoder scheduling parameters and determine if the desired processing objective is met. If the desired processing objective is not met, embodiments continue testing another permutation. A good optimized layer sequence is generally determined within the first 1000 or a limited set of trails. Note that reordering the H matrix does not change the LDPC code specification, thus, embodiments can decode data that is encoded by the original H matrix.

Embodiments first extract several code related parameters that aid in scheduling the decoding process. These parameters may be extracted from the S matrix, the H matrix or the base matrix H_(b). Some embodiments use the base matrix H_(b) and the S matrix to obtain the following parameters. Based on the desired objectives (e.g., reducing pipeline stalls), embodiments optimize the processing order of the layers in the H matrix. For each ordering, embodiments generate the following parameters and see if the desired objective is met.

Check node degree of each layer in H matrix: This is defined as the number of entries in the corresponding row of S matrix, whose value is not equal to −1. This also can be defined as the number of non-zero entries in the corresponding row of the H_(b) matrix as shown in below equation (25),

$\begin{matrix} {{{dc}(l)} = {\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{N_{b}}{{H_{b}\left( {l,n} \right)}.}}} & (25) \end{matrix}$ Variable node degree of each block column in H matrix: This is defined as the number of entries in the corresponding column of the S matrix, whose value is not equal to −1. This also can be defined as the number of non-zero entries in the corresponding column of the H_(b) matrix as shown below in equation (26),

$\begin{matrix} {{{dv}(n)} = {\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{M_{b}}{H_{b}\left( {l,n} \right)}}} & (26) \end{matrix}$

-   Circulant size, z: The size of the block or sub-block or circulant     in the H matrix. -   Block Number, bn: Each non-zero circulant in each layer of the H     matrix is identified with a unique number. -   Circulant Index, ci: Each non-zero circulant in the entire H matrix     is identified with a unique number. -   Block column bc: This is the block column of the specified non-zero     circulant in the H matrix. -   Dependent layer dl: This is the layer that supplies the last updated     information of P message to the specified non-zero circulant. -   Dependent non-zero circulant is the non-zero circulant that supplies     the last updated information of P message to the specified non-zero     circulant. The specified and the dependent circulant share the same     block column. -   Dependent block db: This is the block number of the non-zero     circulant in the dependent layer (DL) that supplies the last updated     information of P message to the specified non-zero circulant. -   Dependent Circulant Index dci: This is the circulant index of the     non-zero circulant in the dependent layer (DL) that supplies the     last updated information of P message to the specified non-zero     circulant. -   Shift Matrix sm: This is the shift coefficient of the specified     non-zero circulant. -   Delta Shift Matrix dsm: This is the delta shift coefficient of the     specified non-zero circulant. Delta Shift Matrix is equal to the     difference of the sm of the specified non-zero circulant and sm of     the dependent non-zero circulant. -   Use Channel Value Flag ucvf: This is the flag of the specified     non-zero circulant. If this flag is 1, it indicates that this is the     first non-zero circulant that is updated in its block column bc. If     this flag is 1 and the iteration is the first iteration, then the     specified non-zero circulant gets the channel LLR value as a P     message. In other cases, the non-zero circulant gets an updated P     message from other non-zero circulants in its block column.

The matrices for the above variables for the complete H matrix are denoted with capital and italics of the same name. Note that some of the matrices need not be stored for some decoder configurations and decoder schedules. Embodiments apply the correction on variable node messages Q and the correction factor for each circulant is based on check node degree and variable node degree. These correction factors are stored in a matrix BETA that is indexed by check node degree and variable node degree of the specified circulant.

The following pseudo-code shows embodiments of 3 algorithms for extracting scheduling parameters from a given H matrix specified by the matrices S and H_(b).

PARAMETER EXTRACTION ALGORITHM PART 1:

The matrix Cl_temp are initialized to zero matrices of size M_(b) ×dc_(max). Due to the irregularity in check node degree (i.e, when dc(l)<dc_(max)), some of the last entries in some of the rows in these matrices remain at zero. As an example, B(i,j) represents the value in the B matrix at ith row and jth column.

BN_temp = zeros(M_(b),N_(b)); CI_temp = zeros(M_(b),dc_(max)); ci = 0; for l = 1:M_(b) BEGIN  bn = 0;  for n = 1:N_(b) BEGIN   if H_(b)(l,n) ≠ 0 BEGIN    ci = ci + 1;    bn = bn + 1;    BN_temp(l,n) = bn;    CI_temp(l,bn) = ci;;   END  END END (27) PARAMETER EXTRACTION ALGORITHM PART II:

DC = zeros(M_(b)); BN = zeros(M_(b),dc_(max)); BC = zeros(M_(b),dc_(max)); DL = zeros(M_(b),dc_(max)); DB = zeros(M_(b),dc_(max)); CI = zeros(M_(b),dc_(max)); DCI = zeros(M_(b),dc_(max)); DV = zeros(N_(b)); SM = −1 * zeros(M_(b),dc_(max)); DSM = −1 * zeros(M_(b),dc_(max)); for l = 1:M_(b) BEGIN  bn = 0;  DC(l) = dc(l); for n = 1:N_(b) BEGIN  if H_(b)(l,n) ≠ 0 BEGIN   bn = bn + 1;   pl = l − 1, if l > 1    = M_(b), if l = 1   while H_(b)(pl,n) == 0 BEGIN   pl = pl − 1, if pl > 1    = M_(b), if pl = 1   END   dl = pl;   db = BN_temp(dl,n);   BC(l,bn) = n;   BN(l,bn) = bn;   DL(l,bn)) = dl;   DB(l,bn) = db;   CI(l,bn) = CI_temp(l,bn);   DCI(l,bn) = CI_temp(dl,db);   SM(l,bn) = S(l,n);   DSM(l,bn) = S(l,n) − S(dl,n);   if DSM(l,bn) < 0 BEGIN DSM(l,bn) = z + S(l,n) − S(dl,n);   END  END   DV(n) = dv(n);  END END (28) PARAMETER EXTRACTION ALGORITHM PART III:

Embodiments also extract the Use Channel Value Flag (UCVF). UCVF = zeros(M_(b),dc_(max)); for n = 1:N_(b) BEGIN  for l = 1:M_(b) BEGIN   if H_(b)(l,n) ≠ 0 BEGIN    UCVF(l,BN_temp(l,n)) = 1;    BREAK THE INNER FOR LOOP AND GO BACK TO OUTER    FOR LOOP  END  END END

FIG. 15 shows an S matrix for an IEEE 802.16e rate 2/3 A code. There are 8 rows and 24 columns in the S matrix. Thus, there are 8 layers (or 8 block rows) and 24 block columns in the corresponding H matrix. The circulant size is 96. Zero circulants are denoted with −1 in the S matrix. So, the H matrix has a zero circulant (i.e. all zero matrix with size 96×96) corresponding to each −1 entry in S matrix. A zero circulant in the H matrix corresponds to a 0 entry in the H_(b) matrix. Assume that processing is performed in layer sequence (i.e., in layer 1, 2, . . . 8) in each iteration.

The following are the parameters of the circulant 1508 marked with the circle (denote this as the specified circulant):

-   -   The specified circulant 1508 belongs to 3rd layer.     -   This is the first non-zero circulant in this layer. So, the         block number bn for the specified circulant 1508 is 1.     -   The circulant index ci for this specified circulant 1508 is 21.     -   The block column be for this specified circulant 1508 is 3.     -   This specified circulant 1508 takes the updated P message from         the circulant 1506 marked with the rectangle. So, circulant 1506         is the dependent circulant of the circulant 1508. The dependent         circulant 1506 has a circulant index ci of 11. So, the dependent         circulant index dci of the circulant 1508 is 11.     -   The layer of the dependent circulant 1506 is 2. So the dependent         layer dl of the circulant 1508 marked with the circle is 2.     -   The block number of the dependent circulant 1506 is 1. So, the         dependent block number db of the specified circulant 1508 is 1     -   The shift coefficient of the specified circulant 1508 is 12.         Thus, the shift matrix coefficient sm of the specified circulant         1508 is 12. The H matrix has a circulant (i.e. identity matrix         of size 96×96 that is cyclically shifted right by the amount 12)         corresponding to 12 entry 1508 in the S matrix. Note that a         non-zero circulant in the H matrix corresponds to 1 entry in the         H_(b) matrix.     -   The shift coefficient of the dependent circulant 1506 is 1. So,         the delta shift matrix coefficient dsm of the specified         circulant 1508 is 12−1=11.     -   The specified circulant 1508 is the second non-zero circulant in         the 3rd block column. Since the specified circulant 1508 is NOT         the first non-zero circulant in its block column, the specified         circulant takes the updated P message from the dependent         circulant 1506 in all the iterations. Therefore, the use channel         value flag ucvf of the specified circulant 1508 is 0.

Referring now to FIG. 11, an irregular block code 1100 suitable out-of-order processing is shown. Embodiments perform out-of order processing at any of several levels of complexity. An embodiment may perform R selection out of order so that the R message can be timely provided for partial state processing of a subsequent layer. Thus, while processing code 1100 the R message for block 1102 of layer 1 may not be selected until needed for partial state processing of the block 1104 of layer 2. The decoder scheduling parameters that facilitate the decoder functionality for this schedule (referred to herein as “schedule 1”) are listed in FIG. 17 to FIG. 30.

An embodiment can reorder block processing such that while processing layer 2, the blocks of layer 2 which depend on layer 1, for example block 1104, will be processed last to allow for latency in the processing pipeline. Thus, in regard to code 1100, the pipeline latency can be up to five without requiring the introduction of stall cycles which would impact throughput. The decoder scheduling parameters that facilitate the decoder functionality for the out of order PS processing and out of order R selection (referred to herein as “schedule 2”) are listed in FIG. 31 to FIG. 44. One difference between schedule 1 and schedule 2 processing is that schedule 2 provides out-of-order block processing. Both schedules process the layers in the same order, i.e., use the same S matrix.

FIG. 23 and FIG. 37 show the circulant index matrices for schedule 1 and schedule 2 respectively. The indices of the circulants processed in layer 2 of FIG. 37 are: [11 16 17 18 20 12 13 14 15 19]. The indices of the circulants processed in layer 2 of FIG. 23, are: [11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20]. In FIG. 26, the 2nd row of the DL matrix gives the dependent layer information: [8 1 1 1 1 8 8 6 1 3]. Since the circulants with circulant indices [12 13 14 15 19] in layer 2 are dependent on layer 1, these circulants in layer 2 will be processed after processing the circulants with circulant indices [11 16 17 18 20]. The resulting 2nd row DL matrix of FIG. 40 is [8 8 8 6 3 1 1 1 1]. Similarly, out-of-order processing is employed on each layer as is shown in FIG. 37. The matrices DCI, DB, DL, BC, SM, DSM, and UCVF are obtained by doing block reordering of their counterpart matrices of schedule 1. The block reordering information is completely specified in the CI matrix of FIG. 37. Based on the pipeline requirements of a particular hardware implementation, embodiments reorder the processing of blocks in each layer, leading to out of order processing for PS processing. Embodiments perform reordering by reordering the BC, DL, DB, DCI, SM, DSM, UCVF, and DC matrices in each row according to the reordering of block numbers in the CI matrix. For example, each row in the BC matrix is reordered differently. FIG. 39 shows the BC matrix for schedule 2 which is the reordered BC matrix of FIG. 25.

For implementations in which a pipeline depth greater than five is desirable, considering again code 1100, an embodiment can reorder the layers first as shown in FIG. 45 and apply out of order processing for R selection and PS processing. Here the processing sequence of layers is optimized such that the possible pipeline depth is 6. One such processing sequence of layers is [3 6 5 2 7 4 1 8]. The H matrix is reordered and the resulting S and H_(b) matrices are shown in FIG. 46 and FIG. 47 respectively. The decoder scheduling parameters are extracted based on out-of-order processing for R selection and PS processing. The parameters are shown in FIG. 46 to FIG. 58. Because the S and H_(b) matrix as seen by the decoder are changed, the decoder scheduling parameters are be quite different from Schedules 1 and 2. Note, however that schedule 3 is essentially schedule 2 applied to a reordered H matrix.

Embodiments obtain improved schedules by reordering based on other criterion and other matrices as well. For example, examination of the DL matrix of FIG. 40 for schedule 2, reveals that layer 3 needs to access FS from layers [7 1 8 7 4 2 2 2 2 2] to generate the R new messages. The layer 7 is accessed at different processing times—however the same value is read. Embodiments can reorder the processing such that the 3rd row in the DL matrix is [7 7 1 8 4 2 2 2 2 2]. Since the two accesses are in consecutive processing time slots, there is only physical read access to the FS memory. This helps minimize the memory power. Similar reordering can be done on the remaining rows of DL matrix. To satisfy both the pipeline requirements and memory access requirements, the reordering of the DL matrix is done such that the DL entries that have the same value are grouped together and the entries that show dependence of the current layer on the previous layer are listed last in the processing schedule.

As an illustration of above scheduling schemes, consider the following scenarios:

-   SCHEDULE 1: No reordering of layers is done. Out-of-order processing     for R new message generation is possible with these parameters. No     out-of-order block processing is performed in PS processing. -   SCHEDULE 2: No reordering of layers is done. Out-of-order processing     for R new message generation is possible with these parameters.     Out-of-order block processing is performed in PS processing. -   SCHEDULE 3: Reordering of layers is done. Out-of-order processing     for R new message generation is possible with these parameters.     Out-of-order block processing is performed in PS processing.     The above scheduling parameters in all the above 3 processing     schedules are applicable to a variety of decoder structures,     including, for example, the decoders 1200, 1300, 1400 of FIGS.     12-14. A difference between these decoders is that R new messages     are generated in order for decoders 1300, 1400, thus the decoders     1300, 1400 have no need for the parameters DL, DB, and DCI. All the     above schedules decode the 802.16e rate 2/3 A code as specified in     IEEE 802.16e standard—however, with different pipeline     characteristics in hardware and thus different hardware efficiencies     in terms of throughput. With schedule 1, the number of pipeline     stages in a decoder without any stall cycles is zero. With schedule     2, the number of pipeline stages in a decoder without any stall     cycles is 5. With schedule 3, the number of pipeline stages in a     decoder without any stall cycles is 6.

For cases in which a pipeline depth greater than six is desirable, considering again code 1100, an embodiment can process the blocks of layer 3 and higher layers that are independent of layers one and two. When the result from layer one is available, an embodiment can process the blocks in layers two and three that are dependent on layer one. When layer two results are also available, an embodiment can complete processing of layer three blocks dependent on layer 2. Thus embodiments perform out-of-order processing at the block level and process the independent blocks. Because embodiments partially process multiple layers partial state memory should be sized to accommodate the number of layers processed.

FIG. 12 shows an LDPC decoder that uses out-of-order processing for decoding irregular LDPC codes in accordance with various embodiments. Embodiments of the decoder 1200 apply vector equations (21)-(24) which are similar to equations (9)-(12). Cyclic shifter 1214 operates as described above in regard to cyclic shifter 504 of decoder 500. Decoder 1200 differs from decoder 500 in a number of respects to enable out-of-order block processing however. The final state storage registers 230 of CNU 200 used in the CNU array 502 of decoder 500 have been moved outside of CNU array 1202 in decoder 1200 to facilitate out-of-order block processing. Thus, final state storage array 1204 provides new final state data 1218 to R new select unit 1213 and old final state data 1220 to R old select unit 1212. Similarly, Q sign memory 1226 provides stored Q sign bits 1228 to the R new select unit 1213 and the R old select unit 1212 for R message generation. Q memory 1224 is randomly accessible to provide the appropriate Q old message 1208 for generation of a new P message 1222 during out-of-order processing.

It is not possible to achieve cyclic shifts specified by s(l,n),(=0, 1, . . . z−1) on a vector of length z with a cyclic shifter of size M×M if M is not a integer multiple of z. So, to accommodate the different shifts needed for WiMax LDPC codes, embodiments use a Benes network, which is of complexity 2log2(M)−1 stages of M 2-in-1 multiplexers. In some embodiments, a memory can be used to store control inputs needed for different shifts if supporting one expansion factor. The memory for providing control signals to the network is equal to

$\frac{M}{2}\left( {{2\;\log\; 2(M)} - 1} \right)$ bits for every shift value that needs to be supported. This results in a large memory requirement to support all the WiMax codes. To avoid the control memory requirement, embodiments employ a cyclic shifter constructed as a Master-slave Benes network to accommodate 114 different parity check matrices in run time for IEEE 802.16e. This approach eliminates the control memory requirements by generating the control signals for the slave data router with the help of a self routing master network. Note that the control memory savings are specific to an IEEE 802.16e decoder.

The following set of equations provide more details as to how equations (21)-(24) are processed in the decoder 1200. of FIG. 12.

The TDMP can be described with the following equations:

∀n = 1,2,...,N_(b) BEGIN Qs(n) = {right arrow over (L)}_(n) [One time Initialization of Qs memory with the channel (29) LLR values] END ∀i = 1,2,...,it_(max), [Iteration loop] BEGIN ∀l = 1,2,...,M_(b), [Sub-iteration loop/layer loop] BEGIN dc = DC(l); (30a) M1_(PS) = QMAX; M 2_(PS) = QMAX; (30b) CS_(PS) = 0; ∀n = 1,2,...,dc, [Block column loop] BEGIN bn = BN(l,n); ci = CI(l,n); bc = BC(l,n); dl = DL(l,n)); db = DB(l,n); dci = DCI(l,n); sm = SM(l,n); dsm = DSM(l,n); ucvf = UCVF(l,n); dv = DV(bc); β = BETA(dc,dv); (31) shft = dsm; if ucvf = 0 = sm if ucvf = 1 (32) R_(new) = {right arrow over (R)}_(dl,db) = R_Select(FS(dl),db,Qsign(dci)); if (ucvf = 1 & i = 1) = 0 = 0 if (ucvf = 1 & i = 1) = 1 (33) Q_(old) = Qs(bc); (34) P_(new) = Q_(old) + R_(new) (35) P_(new) _(—) _(shifted) = [P_(new)]^(shft) (36) R_(old) = {right arrow over (R)}_(cl,bn) = R_Select(FS(l),bn,sign(Q_(old))); if i > 1 = 0 if i = 1 (37) Q_(new) = P_(new) _(—) _(shifted) − R_(old) (38) Qs(bc) = Q_(new); (39) Qmag = max(abs(Q_(new)) − β,0); (40) Qsign(bc) = sign(Q_(new)); (41) M1_(PS) = Min(Qmag,M1_(PS)); (42) M 2_(PS) = Min(Max(Qmag,M1_(PS)),M 2_(PS)); Min_id_(PS) = bn if Q ≤ M1_(PS) (43) CS_(PS) = XOR(sign(Q_(new)),CS_(PS)); (44) PS = {M1_(PS),M 2_(PS),Min_id_(PS),CS_(PS)}; (45) END {M1_(FS),M 2_(FS),Min_id_(FS),CS_(FS)} = {M1_(PS),M 2_(PS),Min_id_(PS),CS_(PS)}; (46) FS(cl) = {M1_(FS),M 2_(FS),Min_id_(FS),CS_(FS)} (47) END END When the decoder 1200 processing starts for a received code word, the Qs memory 1224 is initialized with the channel LLR values as in (29). The processing is generally done from layer 1 to layer M_(b) and the variable l keeps track of which layer is being processed. However, to improve decoder 1200 efficiency, the layers of the H matrix are processed in a different order. The H matrix is reordered and all the decoder scheduling parameters are generated as explained in the previous sections for scheduling parameter generation. Note that this decoder 1200 structure supports out-of-order processing for R new messages, out-of-order processing for PS processing, and layer reordering.

The variable n keeps track of the number of circulants that are processed in each layer. If there is no out-of-order block processing of circulants (for PS processing), then bn=BN(l,n)=n; (i.e. in the nth clock of processing layer l, circulant with block number n). If there is out-of-order block processing of circulants (for PS processing), then bn=BN(l,n); (i.e. in the nth clock of processing layer l, circulant with block number indexed by BN(l,n) is processed). The equation (30a) loads the dc value of the layer that is being processed. The equations in (30b) initialize the partial state registers M1 _(PS),M2 _(PS),CS_(PS). The set of equations in (31) load the parameters for each circulant that need to be processed. Generally, these scheduling parameters are generated using a computer (e.g., a PC or workstation), or an embedded processor coexisting with the decoder on the same or a different integrated circuit. The computer or embedded processor executes a software embodiment of the parameter extraction algorithm and the required decoding schedule to produce the scheduling parameters. The generated schedule is loaded into decoder memory, for example Read Only Memory (“ROM”) or Random Access Memory (“RAM”). All of the scheduling parameters in matrices that are indexed by (l,n) are converted into vectors indexed by ((l-1).DC(l)+n) after removing any invalid entries in each row of the matrix and are stored in decoder memory. However, for clarity, scheduling parameters are shown as accessed using two indices l and n.

The equation (32) represents a simple selection of a required shift coefficient based on the variable ucvf. All the other equations (33-47) are vector operations. The equation (35) represents the P update. The equation (36) represents the shift operation performed on the P message. The equation (38) represents the Q update. The equation (40) represents the correction operation on Q message. The set of equations (42-44) represent the check node partial state processing of finding M1 _(PS),M2 _(PS),Min_id_(PS),CS_(PS). The CS_(PS) represents the cumulative XOR of sign messages of the Q messages processed so far in each row for all the rows in each layer. The CS_(FS) represents the cumulative XOR of sign messages of the all the Q messages in each row for all the rows in each layer. The equations (33) and (37) represent the R new message processing and R old message processing respectively.

The decoder 1200 comprises internal memories to store the internal results or processing. The Q memory 1224 may be double buffered, thus enabling reception of an incoming code word while the decoder 1200 is processing another code word. Equations (29), (34) and (39) represent the read and write operations on Q memory 1224. The FS memory 1204 stores the FS message for all the layers. Equation (47) represents the write operation to FS memory 1204 (note that there is only one write operation per clock cycle). In equation (37), FS(l) represents the read operation from FS memory 1204 to access FS old message 1220 (FS message of the layer of the previous iteration). Note that there is only one read access for each layer as the read address is l inside each sub-iteration loop/layer processing loop.

The decoder contains a separate hard decision memory HD memory which is not shown in 1200. The hard decision bits are the sign bits of P message. The HD memory may also be double buffered, thus enabling processing of the incoming code while sending the decoder decisions to the output interface. The HD memory may have more than two buffers, thus enabling statistical processing of the incoming code words to provide a constant average throughput. This enables the decoder to buffer the hard decisions of the frames that were previously decoded. Since the output interface expects the frames in the same order as they are fed in at the input interface, the HD memory buffers the frames that were processed out-of-order and sends them in-order.

The Q memory 1224 may have more than two buffers, thus enabling statistical processing of the incoming code words to provide a constant average throughput. The incoming code words may differ in the number of errors contained, so the decoder may need a different number of iterations for each frame based on its quality. Allocation of the maximum number of LDPC decoder iterations for each frame can be chosen based on the number of failing LDPC check node constraints in the received frame.

When the LDPC decoder is used as part of an iterative detector in combination with an Inter-Symbol Interference (“ISI”) detector, the Q memory can be used to buffer the Channel LLRs from the ISI detector, Extrinsic messages from the LDPC decoder, and to serve as internal storage for the LDPC decoder's Q messages. Statistical buffering can be applied in this case also. In addition to the Q memory and HD memory, the input memory to the ISI detector is also statistically buffered. The input memory to the ISI detector stores the received samples from the previous block in the receiver chain, for example, a Finite Impulse Response filter. Since both the ISI detector the LDPC decoder work in an outer loop called global iteration, the statistical buffering of Q memory and input memory to the ISI detector would be on the same frames that are not yet decoded or not yet fully decoded (i.e., some of the frames are processed already, however they have not yet converged so further iterations are necessary). The statistical buffering of HD memory is to enable keeping the frames that are already decoded.

In decoder 1200, out-of-order processing for R new message generation is employed. In equation (33) FS(dl) represents the read operation from FS memory to access FS new message 1218 (FS message of the dependent layer of the currently processed circulant). Note that there can be as many as dc read accesses for each layer as the read address is dl inside each sub-iteration and each layer can have as many as min(dc,M_(b)) dependent layers.

The Q sign memory 1310 stores the signs 1308 of all the Q messages of all the circulants in the H matrix. The equation (59) represents the write operation to Q sign memory and the equation (67) represents the read operation from Q sign memory while generating the R new messages 1326. In decoder 1300, equation (55) is not needed because we are not storing the R old messages 1316.

The following set of equations provides more details as to how equations (21)-(24) are processed in the decoder 1300 of FIG. 13. The TDMP can be described with the following equations:

∀n = 1,2,..., N_(b) BEGIN  P (n) = {right arrow over (L)}_(n) [One time Initialization of P memory with the channel (48)  LLR values]  END ∀i = 1,2,...,it_(max), [Iteration loop] BEGIN ∀l = 1,2,...,j, [Sub-iteration loop] BEGIN dc = DC(l); (49a) M1_(PS) = QMAX; M 2_(PS) = QMAX; (49b) CS_(PS) = 0; ∀n = 1,2,...,dc, [Block column loop] BEGIN ci = CI(l,bn); bn = BN(l,n); bc = BC(l,bn); sm = SM(l,bn); dsm = DSM(l,bn); ucvf = UCVF(l,bn); dv = DV(bc); β = BETA(dc,dv); (50) shft = dsm; if ucvf = 0 (51) = sm if ucvf = 1 P_(new) = P(bc); (52) P_(new) _(—) _(shifted) = [P_(new)]^(shft) (53) R_(old) = {right arrow over (R)}_(cl,bn) = R_Select(FS(l),bn,sign(Q_(old))); if i > 1 (54) = 0 if i = 1 R_(old) _(—) _(delayed) (bn) = R_(old) (55) Q_(new) = P_(new) _(—) _(shifted) − R_(old) (56) Qs(n) = Q_(new); (57) Qmag = max(abs(Q_(new)) − β,0); (58) Qsign(bc) = sign(Q_(new)); (59) M1_(PS) = Min(Qmag,M1_(PS)); (60) M 2_(PS) = Min(Max(Qmag,M1_(PS)),M 2_(PS)); Min_id_(PS) = bn if Q ≤ M1_(PS) (61) CS_(PS) = XOR(sign(Q_(new)),CS_(PS)); (62) PS = {M1_(PS),M 2_(PS),Min_id_(PS),CS_(PS)}; (63) END {M1_(FS),M 2_(FS),Min_id_(FS),CS_(FS)} = {M1_(PS),M 2_(PS),Min_id_(PS),CS_(PS)}; (64) FS_temp = FS(l) FS(l) = {M1_(FS),M 2_(FS),Min_id_(FS),CS_(FS)} (65) ∀n = 1,2,..., DC(l), [Another Block column loop] BEGIN ci = CI(l,bn); bn = BN(l,n); bc = BC(l,bn); (66) R_(new) = {right arrow over (R)}_(dl,db) = R_Select(FS_temp,bn,Qsign(ci)); (67) Q_(old) = Qs(n); (68) P_(new) = Q_(old) + R_(new); (69) P(bc) = P_(new); (70) END END END

When the decoder 1300 processing starts for a received code word, the P memory 1330 is initialized with the channel LLR values as in equation (48). The processing is generally done from layer 1 to layer M_(b) and the variable l keeps track of which layer is being processed. However, to improve decoder 1200 efficiency, the layers of the H matrix are processed in a different order. The H matrix is reordered and all the decoder scheduling parameters are generated as explained in the previous sections for scheduling parameter generation. Since out-of-order processing for R new messages is not employed in the decoder 1300, there is no need for scheduling parameters DCI, DB, or DL. Note that the decoder 1300 supports out-of-order processing for PS processing and layer reordering.

The variable n keeps track of the number of circulants that are processed in each layer. If there is no out-of-order block processing of circulants (for PS processing), then bn=BN(l,n)=n; (i.e., in the nth clock of processing layer l, circulant with block number n). If there is out-of-order block processing of circulants (for PS processing), then bn=BN(l,n); (i.e., in the nth clock of processing layer l, circulant with block number indexed by BN(l,n) is processed). The equation (49a) loads the dc value of the layer that is being processed. The equations in (49b) initialize the partial state registers M1 _(PS),M2 _(PS),CS_(PS). The set of equations in (50) load the parameters for each circulant that needs to be processed. Generally, these scheduling parameters are generated using a computer (e.g., a PC or workstation), or an embedded processor coexisting with the decoder on the same or a different integrated circuit. The computer or embedded processor executes a software embodiment of the parameter extraction algorithm and the required decoding schedule to produce the scheduling parameters. The generated schedule is loaded into decoder memory, for example Read Only Memory (“ROM”) or Random Access Memory (“RAM”). All of the scheduling parameters in matrices that are indexed by (l,n) are converted into vectors indexed by ((l−1).DC(l)+n) after removing any invalid entries in each row of the matrix and are stored in decoder memory. However, for clarity, scheduling parameters are shown as accessed using two indices l and n.

The equation (51) represents a simple selection of a required shift coefficient based on the variable ucvf. All the other equations (52-70) are vector operations. The equation (69) represents the P update. The equation (53) represents the shift operation performed on the P message. The equation (56) represents the Q update. The equation (58) represents the correction operation on the Q message. The set of equations (60-63) represent the check node partial state processing of finding M1 _(PS),M2 _(PS),Min_id_(PS),CS_(PS). The CS_(PS) represents the cumulative XOR of signs of the Q messages processed so far in each row for all the rows in each layer. The CS_(FS) represents the cumulative XOR of signs of the all the Q messages in each row for all the rows in each layer. The equations (54) and (67) represent the R new message processing and R old message processing.

The decoder 1300 comprises internal memories to store the internal results of processing. The P memory 1330 may be double buffered, thus enabling reception of an incoming code word while the decoder 1300 is processing another code word. Equations (48), (52) and (70) represent the read and write operations on P memory 1330. Note that in a hardware implementation all the vector processing in the set of equations from (66)-(70) are done on the previously processed layer while the set of equations (52)-(65) are done on the currently processed layer l. Note further that the read operation of equation (52) may create a conflict if the write operation of equation (70) to the same block column in the previously processed layer is not complete. Such read before write conflicts may be handled through insertion of stall cycles. However, embodiments employ a better solution by applying out-of-order processing on PS processing (as in schedule 2 which provides 5 pipeline stages without any stall cycles), and in layer reordering and out-of-order processing on PS processing(as in schedule 3 which provides 6 pipeline stages without any stall cycles).

The FS memory 1304 stores the FS message for all the layers (“m” in FIGS. 13 and 14 represents the number of layers M_(b)). Equation (65) represents the write operation to FS memory. Note that there is only one write operation per clock cycle. In equation (54), FS(l) represents the read operation from FS memory 1304 to access FS old message (FS message of the layer of the previous iteration). Note that there is only one read access for each layer as the read address is l inside each sub-iteration loop/layer processing loop.

The Q FIFO 1324 stores the Q messages 1306 that are sent as inputs to the CNU 1302 and stores them till the CNU processing is complete. Equation (57) represents the write to the Q FIFO 1324 and equation (68) represents the read from Q FIFO 1324.

In decoder 1300, out-of-order processing for R new message 1326 generation is not employed. So there are no read accesses for FS memory 1304 in this decoder configuration for the R new message 1326 generation. The R new messages 1326 are generated in-order as is done in the layered decoder 500 of FIG. 5.

The Q sign memory 1310 stores the signs 1308 of all the Q messages of all the circulants in the H matrix. The equation (41) represents the write operation to Q sign memory and the equation (33) represents the read operation from Q sign memory while generating the R new messages 1326. In decoder 1300, equation (55) is not needed because we are not storing the R old messages 1316.

The set of equations (48)-(65) and the set of equations below provide more details as to how equations (21)-(24) are processed in the decoder 1400 of FIG. 14. However, the second block column loop is different and this difference is described by equations (71)-(76) instead of equations in (66)-(70). The Q FIFO is not needed in decoder 1400. Equation (57) in the first block loop is not needed for decoder 1400. However, in decoder 1400, equation (55) is needed because the R old messages are stored and these messages are read in equation (73). In another embodiment of decoder 1400, the memory for R old messages is omitted by generating delayed R old messages from FS memory 1404 using the value-reuse property (i.e., equation (54) is repeated to generate the delayed R old messages). Thus, embodiments avoiding the FIFO requirement for delayed R old messages have three R message generation units: R new, R old and delayed R old (some times referred to as R prev).

∀n = 1,2,...,dc, [Another Block column loop] BEGIN ci = CI(l,bn); bn = BN(l,n); (71) R_(new) = R_Select(FS_temp,bn,Qsign(ci)); (72) R_(prev) = R_(old) _(—) _(delayed) (n); (73) P_(old) = P(bc); (74) P_(new) = P_(old) + R_(new) − R_(prev); (75) P(bc) = P_(new); (76) END

When constructing the LDPC code matrix itself, layer ordering and block ordering requirements can be taken into account. Independence between adjacent layers can be maximized so that while processing the current layer, the next layer has few dependencies on the current layer.

Some embodiments use scheduled layered approximation as described herein below. In the case of regular LDPC codes with no null matrices, it is not possible to gain any benefit from out-of-order block processing in the block serial decoder 500 of FIG. 5. To enable pipelining without stall cycles, the decoder allows some of the blocks in the currently processed layer to take the updated P message from the layer that is already processed. For instance, consider (5,25) regular LDPC code. Assume that a pipeline depth of 4 is needed to meet the required frequency target for a given throughput and hardware area. Processing each layer takes 25+4 clock cycles if 4 stall cycles are added for 4 pipeline stages. Assume each layer is processed in a layer-time slot that takes 25 clock cycles. The presently processed layer takes the updated P message from the layer that was processed in the previous layer-time slot. It is possible to approximate the layered decoding such that the presently processed layer takes the updated P message from the layer that was processed two layer-time slots previously. However, this layered approximation introduces significant bit error rate performance loss. Embodiments solve this problem by enforcing layered approximation on the circulant level rather than on at the layer level. Since a pipeline depth of 4 is needed, the decoder first processes 4 out of 25 blocks in each layer with the P message update from the layer that was processed two layer-time slots previously. The decoder then processes the remaining 21 blocks out of 25 blocks in each layer with the P message update from the layer that was processed one layer-time slot previously as in the usual layered decoding. To avoid any error floor issues due to the preferential treatment to some of the circulants in H matrix, the decoder changes the set of circulants which would receive the regular layered update and the set which would receive the approximate layered update. Thus, the decoder selects a new set of, for example, 4 circulants that will undergo approximate layered decoding each iteration. The selected circulants can be changed each iteration. In this way after about 6 iterations all of the 25 blocks receive the layered update.

The semi-parallel decoder architecture, as shown in FIG. 10, includes P memory. Embodiments may include one dual-port P memory bank for each of the block columns in the H matrix because each circulant may need to have access to a different set of P values. The P memory has bandwidth of M*d_(c) LLRs and depth of ceil(p/M). Each bank can support a read/write bandwidth of M LLRs. The shift value applied to each circulant may be achieved through a combination of memory addressing and a permuter network of size M×M. The FS Memory is dual port with one port for read and another for write. The FS memory may be able to read and write FS state (M1, −M1, +/−M2 and index for M1) for M rows. Note that for shorter length codes, embodiments may store M1, −M1 and +/−M2, M1 index, and cumulative sign to provide some logic savings. However, for the long length codes it may be beneficial to store M1, M2, M1 index, and cumulative sign as memory may occupy most of the area in the decoder.

The disclosed decoder architecture can be accelerated by further pipelining. The data path may be pipelined at the stages of CNU (2 stages), P computation, Q subtraction, R select units. Memory accesses may be assigned 2 clock cycles. In some embodiments, a pipeline depth of 10 is employed to achieve a target frequency of 400 MHz. Pipelining, however, incurs additional complexity to the decoder. Note in the above case, the logic pipeline depth is about 5 and the pipeline depth related to memory accesses is 5. Whenever the computation of a layer is started, the decoder needs to wait until the pipeline processing of a previous layer is complete. This incurs a penalty of clock cycles equal to the number of hardware pipeline stages for logic which is denoted as V. In the above example, V is 5. To avoid the 5 stall cycle penalty due to memory accesses, some embodiments employ a result bypass technique with local register cache+prefetching for P and hard decision bits and a pre-fetching technique for FS and Qsign memories (or equivalently pre-execution for R old). As a result, the penalty for each iteration measured in number of clock cycle is

${j\left( {{{ceil}\left( \frac{p}{M} \right)} + V} \right)}.$ This can be significant penalty on throughput if V is not small compared to ceil(p/M).

Code Design Constraint: The maximum logic pipeline depth NP_(max) that can be achieved without any stall cycle penalty can be computed for the quasi-cyclic codes as follows. As mentioned earlier, the pipeline depth needed for distant memory access can be dealt with the bypass technique/result forwarding using local register cache-so embodiments need not worry about number of pipeline stages needed in the communication between memories and logic. Some embodiments employ pipelining of no more than 6 to 10 stages for the memory communication as local register cache overhead proportional to the number of memory pipeline stages is provided. If the shifts on the p×p block are specified as left cyclic shift (down cyclic shift):

ΔS_(m,n)=shift_diff(s(m,n)−s(m_prev,n))∀m=1,2. . . j; n=1,2. . . k

If the shifts on the p×p block are specified as right cyclic shift (up cyclic shift):

ΔS_(m,n)=shift_diff(s(m_prev,n)−s(m,n))∀m=1,2. . . j; n=1,2. . . k

Assuming that the layers are numbered from 1 to j, if the current layer is m, denote the next layer to be processed as m_next and the layer that was processed before layer m as m_prev. Because the layers are processed in a linear order in a block parallel layered decoder, m_prev and m_next can be given as follows. Note that for block serial decoders, the layers may be processed in a in reordered fashion.

-   m_prev=m−1 if m>1 -   m_prev=j if m=1 -   m_next=m+1 if m<j -   m_next=1 if m=j -   shift_diff(x,y)=x−y if x≥y -   shift_diff(x,y)=x−y+p if x<y

Assuming that the desired parallelization M is 1:

NP_(m,n)=ΔS_(m,n)−1 if ΔS_(m,n)>0

NP_(m,n)=p if ΔS_(m,n)=0

For the general case of 1≤M≤p, the above equations can be written as:

${{NP}_{m,n} = {{{{floor}\left( \frac{\Delta\; S_{m,n}}{M} \right)} - {1\mspace{14mu}{if}\mspace{14mu}\Delta\; S_{m,n}}} > 0}}\mspace{239mu}$ ${{NP}_{m,n} = {{{{floor}\left( \frac{p}{M} \right)}\mspace{14mu}{if}\mspace{14mu}\Delta\; S_{m,n}} = 0}}\mspace{315mu}$ NP_MAX_LAYER_(m) = min (NP_(m, n))∀m = 1, 2, …  j; n = 1, 2, …  k NP_MAX = min (NP_MAX_LAYER_(m))∀m = 1, 2, …  j    

The number of stall cycles while processing a layer m can be computed as follows:

NS_LAYER_(m)=min(v−NP_MAX_LAYER_(m), 0)

If v is less than or equal to NP_MAX, then there are no stall cycles and the number of clock cycles per each iteration is given by:

${Nclk\_ Iteration} = {j \times {{ceil}\left( \frac{p}{M} \right)}}$

Calculation of Pipeline Depth for option 1, general permutation matrices, and random LDPC codes: Num_Last_Overlapped_rows_(m)=Number of independent rows in the current layer m, which does not depend on the last Np rows of the previous layer m_prev. Assuming that the desired parallelization M is 1:

NP_MAX_LAYER_(m)=Num_Last_Overlapped_rows_(m)

For the general case of 1≤M≤p, the above equations can be written as

${{NP\_ MAX}{\_ LAYER}_{m}} = {{floor}\left( \frac{{Num\_ Last}{\_ Overlapped}{\_ rows}_{m}}{M} \right)}$

If v is less than or equal to NP_MAX, then there are no stall cycles and the number of clock cycles per each iteration is given by:

${Nclk\_ Iteration} = {j \times {{ceil}\left( \frac{p}{M} \right)}}$

Given the above equations, the LDPC codes may be designed such that NP_MAX is equal to or greater than the desired NP_MAX. For array codes specified with the permutation blocks with the right (up) cyclic shift, the NP_MAX is given as

${NP\_ MAX} = {\frac{\left( {k - 1} \right)}{2}.}$

Re-ordering of rows with in a layer for Option 2: If the code is not designed to satisfy the pipeline constrain in option 1, as is the case of 10-GB LDPC codes, 802.11n and 802.16e LDPC codes, embodiments may apply a shift offset to each layer such that NP_MAX is maximized. So essentially all the rows in each layer may be re-ordered subject to the constraint that each block in the matrix still has groups of M rows for the ease of parallelization. As an example, consider the array codes specified with the permutation blocks with the left (down) cyclic shift. NP_MAX=0. However, a shift offset of down shift of p on all the blocks in all the layers will make it the same as array code with the permutation blocks with the right (up) cyclic shift for decoding purposes. In this case, the relevant equations listed for QC-LDPC codes in the above paragraphs show that

${NP\_ MAX} = {\frac{\left( {k - 1} \right)}{2}.}$ However because of reordering due to shift offset, the P values from the buffer have to be read in a fashion accounting for the re-ordering.

Because the check node degree can vary for different mother matrices, to provide the same level of throughput at different check node degrees, embodiments can process a variable number of rows for different mother matrices. Accordingly, the CNU (as discussed herein) can be highly configurable with varying number of inputs. For instance to, support the mother matrices with (dc=40 and dc=20) with edge parallelization of 400, the CNU can selectably process 10 rows in one clock cycle corresponding to dc=40 and 20 rows in one clock cycle corresponding to dc=20. A decoder may include 20 parallel CNUs with number of inputs that is equal to 20. In the case of split processing, a decoder may include 40 parallel CNUs with number of inputs equal to 10 to support the same edge parallelization throughput requirement and to support odd and even block column processing.

Some embodiments provide more reconfigurability: for instance to support the mother matrices with (dc=36, dc=24 and dc=12) with edge parallelization of 216, an embodiment can process 6 rows in one clock cycle corresponding to dc=36; 9 rows in one clock cycle corresponding to dc=24; 18 rows in one clock cycle corresponding to dc=12. Accordingly, a decoder may include 18 parallel CNUs with number of inputs equal to 12. To support mother matrices with dc less than 36 and above 24, an embodiment can process only 6 rows leading to reduced edge parallelization. To support mother matrices with dc less than 24 but above 12, an embodiment can process 9 rows leading to reduced edge parallelization. To support mother matrices with dc less than 12, an embodiment can process 18 rows leading to reduced edge parallelization. FIGS. 59A-59E provide more details on the reconfigurable min1-min2 finder. Note that reconfiguration multiplexer logic can be to be used at the memories and other processing elements as well. A similar principle can be applied for other cases in general.

The block serial decoder architecture (e.g., as shown in FIGS. 5, 8, 9, and 12) has better run-time reconfigurability than the parallel layered decoder architecture. The block serial architecture may be a better choice for supporting multiple code lengths and code profiles. However, the parallel layered decoder (as shown in FIG. 10) has better energy efficiency, so it is suitable for applications where limited run-time reconfiguration is needed.

FIG. 59A shows a Partial Bitronic Merge circuit PBM4+ suitable for use in a reconfigurable min1-min2 finder. PBM4+ receives inputs r, s, t, and u. Inputs r, s, t, and u form two bitonic sequences. R and s form a bitonic sequence of increasing order (i.e., r<s). t and u form a bitonic sequence of decreasing order (i.e., t>u). PBM4+ outputs min1(M1) and min2(M2) along with the min1 index (M1 index). T, u, s, and r have indices of 0, 1, 2, and 3 respectively.

FIG. 59B shows Bitonic Merge circuits BM2+ and BM2− that sort inputs A and B to provide sorted outputs and output flags as indicated.

FIG. 59C shows a hierarchical Min1-Min2 finder that employs PBM4+ circuits to construct a PBM8+.

FIG. 59D shows a hierarchical Min1-Min2 finder that employs M1_M2f10 circuits and PBM4+ circuits to reconfigurably provide various finder widths. 8 M1_M2f10 circuits and 4 PBM4+ circuits can be employed to construct 4 M1_M2f20 circuits.

Similarly, FIG. 59E shows 8 M1_M2f10 circuits and 6 PBM4+ circuits arranged to construct 2 M_M2f40 circuits.

Embodiments may apply any of a variety of LDPC Min-Sum Correction Methods. The different correction methods disclosed herein are suitable for efficient hardware implementation for regular and irregular codes for the min-sum decoding algorithm.

Method 1: OMS/NMS (normalized min-sum): For regular QC-LDPC codes, it is sufficient to apply correction for R values or Q values. For more information see J. Chen, A. Dholakia, E. Eleftheriou, M. Fossorier, and X. Y. Hu, Reduced-complexity decoding of LDPC codes, IEEE TRANS. ON COMMUNICATIONS, 1288 (Aug. 2005).

Method 2: 2-D OMS/2-D NMS: For irregular QC-LDPC codes, standard practice is to apply correction for R messages and Q messages in two steps. Either offset or scaling method can be used. For more information see J. Zhang, M. Fossorier, D. Gu, and J. Zhang, Two-dimensional correction for min-sum decoding of irregular codes, IEEE COMMUNICATION LETTERS, 180 (Mar. 2006).

Method 3: 2-D NMS-gamma: Apply a scaling operation to reduce the over-estimated reliability values for the irregular LDPC codes. The scaling factor circulant_gamma is a multiple of R scaling factor alpha and Q scaling factor gamma for each circulant. Each block row has a different alpha. Each block column has a different beta. To obtain the scaling coefficients alpha and beta see J. Zhang, M. Fossorier, D. Gu, and J. Zhang, Two-dimensional correction for min-sum decoding of irregular codes, IEEE COMMUNICATION LETTERS, 180 (Mar. 2006). Each circulant has a different scaling factor gamma.

Method 4: 2-D NMS-gamma offset: This method is similar to Method 3. However a correction factor gamma_offset that is derived from gamma (or in a different manner either based on density evolution or experimental trials) can be applied as an offset for the Q messages instead of a scaling factor. However for this method, the quantization needs to be uniform with step size an integer multiple of all different offsets.

Method 5: NMS value-reuse/OMS value-reuse: For regular QC-LDPC codes, if performing correction on the output of check node processing (R messages), the scaling/offset correction needs to be done for only two values (Min1, Min2). So for the case of regular QC-LDPC, this correction is performed in the CNU processing labeled as FS (Final State) processing.

Method 6: 1-D NMS-gamma, BN (bit-node) irregular: For check node regular and bit-node irregular QC-LDPC codes, it is sufficient to apply correction for R values based on the block column. Because R_old and R_new need to be scaled, it is easier to apply the algorithm transformation such that scaling is applied to Q messages. Each block column has a different scaling factor gamma and this scaling is applied to Q messages. This method is similar to Method 3 in terms of dataflow graph except that gamma values are directly given by beta values instead of alpha*beta.

Method 7: 1-D NMS-gamma offset, BN irregular: For check node regular and bit-node irregular QC-LDPC codes, it is sufficient to apply correction for R values (as an offset correction) based on the block column. This method is similar to Method 6 except that the gamma offset is used as the offset correction instead of using gamma as the scaling factor. In implementation, Method 7 and Method 4 are similar except for the way the gamma offset parameters are calculated.

Method 8: NMS-alpha, CN (check node) irregular: For check node irregular and bit-node regular QC-LDPC codes, it is sufficient to apply correction for R values/Q values depending on the block row(i.e. check node profile). The correction is scaling factor alpha. For this kind of check node irregular QC-LDPC codes, if the correction is applied on the output of check node processing (R messages), the scaling correction needs to be done for only two values (Min1, Min2). Thus, the correction is performed in the CNU processing labeled as FS (Final State) processing. In implementation, Method 8 is similar to Method 5 except the correction factor varies based on the block row.

Method 9: NMS-alpha offset, CN irregular: For check node irregular and bit-node regular QC-LDPC codes, it is sufficient to apply correction (offset correction) for R values/Q values depending on the block row (i.e. check node profile). The correction is offset based on alpha. For this kind of check node irregular QC-LDPC codes, if the correction is applied on the output of check node processing (R messages), the offset correction may be applied to only two values (Min1, Min2). Thus, the correction is performed in the CNU processing labeled as FS (Final State) processing. In implementation, Method 9 is similar to Method 5 except the correction factor varies based on the block row.

While illustrative embodiments of this invention have been shown and described, modifications thereof can be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit or teaching of this invention. The embodiments described herein are illustrative and are not limiting. Many variations and modifications of the methods and apparatus are possible and are within the scope of the invention. Generally, embodiments encompass any system incorporating forward error correction. Accordingly, the scope of protection is not limited to the embodiments described herein, but is only limited by the claims which follow, the scope of which shall include all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A low density parity check (LDPC) code decoder, comprising: decoding circuitry configured to process blocks of an LDPC matrix, the decoding circuitry comprising: a control unit that controls processing by the decoding circuitry, the control unit configured to cause the decoding circuitry to process blocks of a layer of the LDPC matrix out of order, wherein the control unit is configured to cause the decoding circuitry to process each block of the LDPC matrix in processing substeps comprising: an R new update substep that provides an R new message, wherein the R new message is produced for a block of a different layer of the matrix from a layer containing a block currently being processed; an R old update substep that provides an R old message, wherein the R old message is produced for a layer of the matrix currently being processed; a P message substep that generates updated P messages; a Q message substep that computes variable node messages (Q messages); and a check node partial state processing substep that updates partial state of the layer based on Q messages computed for the block.
 2. The LDPC code decoder of claim 1, wherein the decoding circuitry is configured to generate a Q message by combining an R message with a P message.
 3. The LDPC code decoder of claim 1, wherein the decoding circuitry further comprises a permuter configured to permute a P message.
 4. The LDPC code decoder of claim 3, wherein the permuter is configured to permute the P message by a difference of permutation of a second block currently being processed and permutation of a block previously processed; wherein the second block currently being processed and the block previously processed are in a same block column of the LDPC matrix.
 5. The LDPC code decoder of claim 1, wherein the decoding circuitry is configured to subtract a second R old message from a permuted P message to generate a Q message.
 6. The LDPC code decoder of claim 1, wherein the decoding circuitry is configured to select one of an updated P message and a channel log-likelihood ratio (LLR) for storage in a P memory, wherein a channel LLR is selected to initialize decoding.
 7. The LDPC code decoder of claim 1, wherein the decoding circuitry is further configured to select an R message from a plurality of previously generated possible R messages based on at least a message index value and a sign bit.
 8. The LDPC code decoder of claim 1, wherein the LDPC matrix is quasi-cyclic.
 9. A method comprising: processing blocks of a layer of a low density parity check (LDPC) matrix out of order, the processing of each of the blocks comprising: an R new update step comprising providing an R new message, the R new message produced for a block of a different layer of the matrix from a layer containing a block currently being processed; an R old update step comprising providing an R old message, the R old message produced for a layer of the matrix currently being processed; a P message step comprising generating updated P messages; a Q message step comprising computing variable node messages (Q messages); and a check node partial state processing step comprising updating partial state of the layer based on Q messages computed for the block.
 10. The method of claim 9, further comprising generating a Q message by combining an R message with a P message.
 11. The method of claim 9, further comprising permuting a P message.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein permuting the P message comprising permuting the P message by a difference of permutation of a second block currently being processed and permutation of a block previously processed; wherein the second block currently being processed and the block previously processed are in a same block column of the LDPC matrix.
 13. The method of claim 9, further comprising subtracting a second R old message from a permuted P message to generate a Q message.
 14. The method of claim 9, further comprising selecting one of an updated P message and a channel log-likelihood ratio (LLR) for storage in a P memory, and further comprising selecting a channel LLR to initialize decoding.
 15. The method of claim 9, further comprising selecting an R message from a plurality of previously generated possible R messages based on at least a message index value and a sign bit.
 16. The method of claim 9, wherein the LDPC matrix is quasi-cyclic. 